Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

While there are certainties in our faith, those things that none of us as Christians dispute, we unfortunately have our differences as well. Perhaps in the beginning of our knowledge and faith in Jesus Christ, we would become insecure or feel threatened by differing theology. As we mature in our faith, we tend to broaden our scope of God and stretch our acceptance of those doctrines or claims with which we have disagreement(s). We acknowledge that where the critical definition of salvation matters, we at least have that in common, so, basically we agree to disagree on the finer points of our theologies.

However, when someone makes an authoritative assertion that because of a point of doctrine difference, the differing opinion indicates the holder of that opinion is not a believer, it grates on us since we have no doubt whatsoever that we are saved by the precious Blood of the Lamb (Jesus Christ, Son of God) given in death on the Cross to redeem our sorry, sinful souls.

Likewise, but of course to a lesser extent, it grates on me when writers make authoritative claims about certain attributes of writing. As many writers as there are, both published and awaiting publication, it is actually ridiculous to assume or assert that certain kinds of writing or writers demonstrate less ability, quality, attractiveness in storytelling, than others. Stephen King cites both Ernest Hemingway and William Faulkner as geniuses in their writing skills. While I enjoyed some of Hemingway’s stories, I detested his writing skills. His writing was like starvation, desperately hungry for more words—which as it turned out he diligently and intentionally sought to decrease to skeleton fare and succeeded. William Faulkner is one of my least favorite authors (polite speak for I hated his work or intensely disliked it anyway). Absolutely one of the most difficult authors I’ve ever had to read. I’ve never read Stephen King’s novels, but I read his entertaining book On Writing which gave ample evidence of his creative skills—even in non-fiction.

Author Dan Brown of Da Vinci Code fame is said by many to be a hack who happened to write about an intriguing premise. (Intriguing maybe to those who wish there was any other way to God except through Jesus Christ.) Writers and readers can argue incessantly about skills, the craft, the talented and untalented, styles, and types of writing, and repeat the same points and counterpoints ad nauseum—and with all the learned qualifications to document what only turns out to be “opinion”.

“Art” is ultimately subjective. Some professionals lampoon certain bestselling novels, scratching their collective heads about a book they feel is inferior in every way. What they basically insist is that the audience is unsophisticated, not intellectually gifted, a “common” and uneducated lot who wouldn’t recognize good writing if it bit them in the . . . eyes?

You can argue until your temples pulse about what you believe to be “quality” prose and what you think is mindless garbage, but it doesn’t really matter because if you desire to be published, you will dance to the particular drum roll of the publishing house musicians (aka pub boards) you prefer. And if they rave about your skill but your books don’t sell, you won’t be invited back for another performance after your first couple of concerts.

So a writer or any literary professional can whine about the audience’s taste in books, but in the biz of publishing—Christian publishing, too—money is the language spoken. I think it’s amusing that few people challenge the professionals’ tastes other than to slam the CBA with criticisms which are usually charged by those who haven’t read more than a couple CBA books in years or have a desire to read what they consider more literary (code for “quality”) literature and claim they can’t find it in the CBA.

Those who are given the skills and direction to write fiction, who are called by God to do this writing thing, must realize the heart of the matter is obedience to Him, not pleasing some self-appointed judge of skills or even some gifted editor. The writers are as diverse as the people themselves, and no one who has worked to hone his skills and develop his craft should have to read or listen to people berate their type/style of writing.

Ultimately, once more and still again, it’s not about us, our preferences and opinions. It’s about doing what God through His Spirit has told us to do. And somehow, some way, that usually involves pointing to His Son Jesus Christ.

Father, I’ve done things my way and failed miserably in the past. I know you have the best to offer, the right road, the perfect plan. I want to be in the place you have for me, and I don’t want to veer off that track. Lead me, guide my steps to follow hard after you. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Posted in

10 responses to “Authoritative . . . ?”

  1. dayle Avatar

    Nicole, if you’ve never read How to Write Best Selling Fiction by Dean Koontz, you might want to. He hits on a lot of these points. And, it’s better than King’s book in my subjective opinion.
    He mentions his former English teacher who wishes he would write something important. As though he is a failure for being so popular. He mentions other writers who can’t write well but had success because of their creativity. He believes that the elitist are wrong. Sales are an indication of good writing. Readers should not be trivialized. They are the ultimate judge of your work. Not academia.
    Jerry Jenkins admits to being a pedestrian writer and I agree with him. The result – 60 million in sales and counting. I wouldn’t mind being that pedestrian.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    Thanks, Dayle, for the book recommendation. Ultimately (and I know you would agree) as Christian writers, we must write from our hearts according to the direction the Holy Spirit is leading us. Yes, we should want to be “good” at our craft–as good as we can be–but pleasing the Lord with our work is our primary objective, right? Pleasing man is just really not an option, but God can certainly add that pleasing response if that is His plan for us. The old “die to self” thing . . .

    Like

  3. Nicole Avatar

    Would you mind specifying what specifically you think is “not cool”, Matthew? Thanks.

    Like

  4. dayle Avatar

    There are plenty of niches out there. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure.
    For me, success is following God’s will.
    The trick is to be content in that endevour. Of course, ego gets in the way. I am only human. I do want to sell a lot of books. I want fame, fortune, accolades. But that’s not what drives me.
    If by following the will of God, I am destined to have meager sales then so be it.
    Ultimately, I hope my work touches people. Whether it is just to comfort them, help them see their relationship with God a little clearer, or something even more meaningful.
    Btw, I wrote an incredibly brilliant comment earlier and thought I posted it, but I guess I messed up. Unfortunately, I don’t remember what I wrote, so the world had been deprived of my genius once again. 😉

    Like

  5. Nicole Avatar

    LOL, Dayle. Matthew gets triplicated, and you get eliminated. What’s goin’ on? Dang!

    Like

  6. Timothy Fish Avatar

    A couple of years ago I wrote an article about Psalm 33:3. It is at http://www.fortworthbaptistchurch.org/Articles/Article.asp?ID=54 and more correctly applies what I think is meant by the verse, but I think the principle can be applied here as well. God calls for us to “play skillfully with a loud voice.” If we apply this to writing, I think we can say that God wants us to get our work out there (with a loud voice), but he also wants us to so so skillfully. I love to hear people praise my writing. I listen when people disagree with the premise behind my writing, but I take it to heart when people are critical of my skill in writing. Why? Because that is the one thing that I can improve the most. I can’t force people to tell me when they think my writing is good. If I am writing what I believe to be true, I can’t force people to accept the facts, but if someone tells me, “you know, I think you would get your point across better if you did this instead of what you did,” then I am going to pay attention. I think God wants us to continue to work to improve our skill. It is easy to say, “I’m going to write the way I want and I don’t care what other people think,” but the truth is that if we don’t have people who are willing to read what we write then it is a waste of time to write. Even if we sell thousands of books, if the reader goes to sleep before he reaches page two then all the other pages are just wasted. That is where criticism and using it to improve our skill is helpful. We have to hook the reader and keep them hooked if we have any hope of giving them the message we have for them.

    Like

  7. Nicole Avatar

    Timothy, while I agree with the improvement of writing skills–and I think every writer would–there isn’t a writer alive who can hook every reader and keep them hooked because of the subjectivity of this “art”. We are wise to assimilate criticism and evaluate if it can be effectual for us (and that is inclusive of our humility in our evaluations). But writing in obedience to an ordained calling does not guarantee “commercial” success and everything associated with that stereotype. If our “message” is meant to address a few or a bundle of readers, we have to trust that God is able to show us how to get it where He wants it.

    Like

  8. Divorces Avatar

    This is a good blogs I have enjoyed very much

    Like

  9. Nicole Avatar

    Thank you. Very glad to have you stopping by.

    Like

Leave a comment