Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

Standing back from all the instructions in books about the craft of writing, even stepping away from basic grammar and the use of action/passive verbs, adverbs, and adjectives, let’s talk about novels from a reader’s viewpoint.

Readers who have little time but love to read . . . It would figure that these types of readers might prefer a novel that zips along, maybe a book that runs around 300 pages in a smaller trim size. After all, they’re sacrificing every minute they spend between those pages, and they want to be rewarded for it. There’s a little bit of instant gratification involved.

Readers who have enough time to read novels but are impatient with stories that don’t grab them and make them hang on . . . Thrillers are really the best genre for these readers, although a fast moving fantasy might take them away quickly. No one in Christian fiction does thrillers better than Robert Liparulo. Or perhaps some of the female readers in this group might like the lits for their quick-moving plots and sometimes sardonic wit and humor.

Readers who want to read a good mystery but like to be catapulted into the action . . . Brandilyn Collins or Colleen Coble or James Scott Bell can facilitate those readers who don’t want to spend too much time with a book. For those readers who are willing to invest any amount of time relaxing—or not so much depending on the story—might like the Randy Alcorn series Deadline, Dominion, and Deception or Randy Singer’s books.

I used to read a lot of Karen Kingsbury’s work. Not so much anymore. Has her writing diminished in quality? No. I just prefer longer stories with more character development and longer, more complex situations revealed in detail. I think two of her best books were One Tuesday Morning and Beyond Tuesday Morning. No one can argue with Karen’s success, and I think it’s because her stories resonate with huge volumes of ordinary people who’ve found themselves and their circumstances revealed in the pages of Karen’s novels where hope and redemption are offered for even the darkest of experiences.

Perhaps I’m among a dying breed of readers. Reading a novel is like going on a trip for me. (No comments, please, on what “trip” meant in the “good ol’ days” of my rebellious past.) I start out on the adventure and am willing to go wherever the author leads me, hoping once I board the train of his words, he won’t make me get off at the first stop. I want to ride that book all the way to the end of the line and hope I get to see a lot of city, countryside, and all different kinds of people along the way. Kind of like when I went to Europe so long ago. Every day was an adventure filled with new people, places, smells, sights, images, and sounds. Almost too much to take in but so exhilarating to try.

Reverting back for a moment to instructions for writing novels, every agent, editor, and writing instructor mimics each other with this mantra: If it doesn’t contribute to the story, get it out of there. For readers and writers like me, this is an ambiguous statement. Multiple things contribute to the story for me. The color of someone’s shoes, the ring of a distant doorbell, the smirk of a stranger—few things seem out of place for me if the author’s writing is intriguing. Fiction has its basis in truth. Life plays on in sight, sound, touch, feeling, emotion, spiritual occurrences seen and unseen, and the compositions of varying levels of thoughts and perceptions. That’s real life for me, and I want to “see” it on the pages of the novels I read. Nearly everything contributes to the story for me if it’s well done. Every means and method to portray the different lives of characters is A-okay with me because not every story should be told the same way.

How do you define yourself as a reader? Have you narrowed down your preferences in genres to read? Do you read all kinds of fiction? What are your favorites? Why?

Father, thank you for all the incredible differences and variety in your creation of people, places, and things. You are amazing in your never ending imagination. Thank you for Truth. Thank you for ears to hear, eyes to see. Thank you for my desire to use and experience all the senses when writing. Thank you, Lord. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

*PLEASE PRAY FOR KRISTY DYKES*

Posted in

5 responses to “From a reader’s point of view . . .”

  1. dayle Avatar

    I like a book that works on many levels. And I pretty much only like Dean Koontz style cross genre suspense.
    I like short novels because of my personality I guess. Something about not seeing progress ( the remainding pages getting fewer) bugs me internally.
    I have found that a straight mystery or action novel doesn’t excite me. I need cross genre. Maybe because I started with and almost exclusively read Dean Koontz for a few years.
    But I do like the occasional contemporary drama. such as Something that Lasts.

    Like

  2. Kay Avatar
    Kay

    I read all kinds of fiction. I do wish that I were a more leisurly reader as you are. I find it difficult to read Dickens, for example. I really want to read him, but the times I’ve tried, I end up stopping after a few pages. I am reading The Scarlet Letter right now, but skipped the long introduction, and skim through some of the wordier description passages.
    I love fantasy, sci-fi, spec fic, mystery. I have read nearly all of Agatha Christy’s books. Even cozy mysteries are fun, like the Cat Who… books. But I haven’t found Christian mystery writers that I like. I don’t care for suspense, or supernatural thrillers.
    I don’t care for romance. Too formulaic for me, and unrealistic.
    But I like about everything else.
    I do find I like to get hooked early on, though. Am I just a product of our ADD age? I hope not. I try to stretch myself.

    Like

  3. Nicole Avatar

    Kay, I detest Dickens and The Scarlet Letter is one of the most depressing stories filled with unlikable characters I’ve ever had to read.
    Although I prefer longer novels, it isn’t the length specifically I want. It’s the depth.
    The hook factor is what I view as subjective. What hooks you might not hook me, but I’ll stay with it because I’m usually committed to giving the author a chance.
    Dayle, I think I feel the same about Peretti as you do about Koontz. However, I wasn’t crazy about Monster (too spec for me), but I love Peretti’s writing.

    Like

  4. dayle Avatar

    I’m sending my hardcover copy of Monster to the troops. I didn’t hate it, but it didn’t form that bond with me either.
    House was good. I bought the Oath but haven’t read it yet. Too long. I’ll get to it one day when I run out of short books.
    I’m trying to expand my reading, so I just bought a Charles Martin book.
    I also love books Peace Like a River and River Rising where the Godly supernatural part isn’t too obvious and there’s always a hint of doubt as to whether it really happened. Probably because that’s what I was trying to accomplish in my book.

    Like

  5. Nicole Avatar

    The Oath is just awesome, Dayle. I mean it. It’s a fantastic novel. It would make such a great film if the right people did it.
    You’re kind of in between the literary crowd and . . . what?

    Like

Leave a comment