Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

Technically I’m not a writer. But what I mean by that is if I had to consider the technical breakdowns of a story, I’d fall flat on my keyboard head first. Emotion propels me into story. Passion drives that emotional train, and if I can’t write passionately about something, I might as well not even attempt it. Let me make it clear right now: if you are a technical writer, that is one who sets up, plots, plans, and pursues the story through organizational techniques, I applaud you. Seriously. It’s just that I can’t do it that way.

I am a very sequential person. To force me to get to B or C without first visiting A will propel me into confusion. Except when I’m random. Which is rarely. But still. Sometimes I am.

So when I hear that this or that technique works well to increase tension within a story, or to use certain methodology to create angst, fear, humor, or whoknowswhat, I wonder how I ever learned those things. They can be present in my writing but not intentionally—at least not because of my technical efforts to put them in action.

It’s old news that I’m a rule breaker with the quantifier of I believe one must possess a solid core knowledge of those rules in order to effectively break them. To my friends it’s also well known that I love variety in story elements and styles and voices. Travis Thrasher told a tale in second person POV. How often have you read a story that dared to do that? It worked. Great idea. In his last novel he was all over the map with POVs, and he did it wonderfully. Good efforts. And I say: Go for it!

We all know that basic storytelling follows a formula. After awhile, those formulas can seem repetitive so it’s noteworthy when an author breaks stride to produce something a little daring or different from the norm. Of course in order to be successful they must do it in an appealing or provocative way. And who’s to say what that might be?

I admire technically perfect writers. Those who craft and form a story sometimes before it’s even written amaze me. I can jot a note here and there if something necessary but down the road to the story comes along, but structuring and organizing a story doesn’t happen in my world. It unfolds as the words hit the page.

No wonder I’m technically challenged.

Father, all I can say is thank you for your variety, your sense of humor. I’m sure I’ve given you multiple eye-rolling moments. And hopefully lots of laughter. How else could you put up with me? I love you, Lord. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Posted in

2 responses to “Technical Schmechnical!”

  1. Jessica Thomas Avatar

    I think I am leaning more towards structure and technicality. My issue is, I really have to “see” the story before I can describe it or make it interesting. As such, I’m realizing, I need to sort of story board my novels before I sit down to write them. In one I’m working on right now, I’ve decided to just sit, think about the story from the beginning, and jot down what I “see”. It’s not readable at all, it’s just me trying to paint the picture in my mind.
    It may have to do with time constraints. If I only have 15 minutes to write a day, I really need to make it count. To do that, I need to have the picture set and ready in my mind.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    And it makes perfect sense to do that, Jess. I do ruminate a lot about characters and the basic story before I write, take an occasional note so I don’t forget what I hope to use, but in the actual writing I don’t plot or formulate such things as tension, particular words to use to ratchet up different emotions, etc. For me those have to come “naturally”.
    What you do is a good thing, btw.

    Like

Leave a comment