Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

Bestselling author and my wonderful friend Robert Liparulo ponied up a worthy explanation to yesterday’s post, so for those of you who didn’t have the time to read it, here is his response:

Nicole, you're right. Unconditional returns happen at all levels of book retailing and publishing. As Dayle said, it's a way of getting books that the retailer is unsure about on the shelf. Unproven authors have a chance to be found by consumers under this policy.

However, it's painful to both publishers and authors. Publishers hold back royalties owed authors for a period of time so that future returns can be accounted for and factored into the "true" royalties owed (actual sell-through of the books). These amounts are often in the thousands and even tens of thousands of dollars.

Some stores (usually Christian retailers; rarely mainstream retailers) will not allow authors to sign their books because the stores fear that then they cannot return the unsold but signed books. But most publishers including Christian publishers WILL accept signed books back. I wish publishers would make their policy of accepting the return of signed books clear to retailers, since signatures help move books and may result in fewer returns.

The returns are very expensive for publishers. Shipping is one of the most expensive aspect of book publishing and distribution. And it reflects poorly on the author if a lot of his books come back unsold.

"Lay down" is the term used for the number of books sold into stores (usually prior to their release dates). "Sell through" is the term for this number less returns.

I don't think anyone except the retailer likes this policy, but I don't know how it can be fixed without harming the hundreds of unknown or up-and-coming authors whose careers rely on being in bookstores that would otherwise not take a chance on them. Interestingly, if booksellers carried only bestsellers, eventually there would be no bestsellers.

Perhaps what's needed is a program that allows retailers to drastically discount unsold books after a given time in hopes of pushing them out, instead of returning them. But then that'll open up a new can of worms.

(An exception to the return policy is when a retailer–often a specialty retailer like Scholastic or Wal-Mart–special orders a large quantity. In exchange for deeper discounts, they agree not to return the books.)

I hope you will refer to yesterday’s post and read the responses.

As per author Mike Dellosso’s suggestion, I took a trip to the Family Christian Bookstore in my area to inquire about this policy. Here’s what I learned. Spring Arbor buys their books from publishing reps. Spring Arbor in turn sends their selections to the retail stores. Twice a year Spring Arbor sends a list to the stores of the books which can be returned for refunds. The individual stores do not order (other than special orders from Spring Arbor’s catalogue) the selections or decide what is returned. So, demographics obviously are not a factor in stocking individual stores’ selections.

In visiting the Borders Bookstore I learned their books are decided upon and ordered by their corporate headquarters. Any refunds on books are also decided by their corporate people. I also “heard” that the beautiful store in this particular mall might not be there much longer. Rumors have been flying for a couple of years about Borders going under. I’d hate to see it.

Lord, you are our source for all good things. You are who we’re desperate for, who we truly need to lead us, who we ultimately desire to please. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Posted in

6 responses to “More non-sense.”

  1. Jessica Thomas Avatar

    That would be a shame to see Borders go under. The fact is, they have to take technology into consideration and keep up with it. We are seeing Blockbuster stores close because technology has changed. If they had jumped on the bandwagon soon enough, perhaps they could have altered their business model to become more virtual and stayed competitive.
    Places like Borders are undoubtedly going to have to change their model, perhaps drastically to stay afloat. I would think they’d have to go to more of a print on demand format, where if the person wants the book in hard copy, it’s printed for them at the store. It seems they could have one hard copy on the shelves, and give the option to buy soft or hard copy versions. That would solve the whole warehousing/distribution/returns problem.
    I really think the publishing companies are going to have to start moving faster. (altho that’s probably like trying to make a dinosaur run…or worse, like trying to change business process inside the federal government…)

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    Borders is a reading lounge-type store. People browse, sit, read, use their laptops, buy books, stationery, magazines, cards, and movies.
    I guess I don’t demand much more from a bookstore, and the tech aspects which you describe wouldn’t matter to me, but I understand the demands of techies can be ever increasing.
    Blockbuster is now a rare store in these parts and the two Hollywood Video stores just closed without explanation in two different areas close to us. It’s hard to know what people really expect anymore. This is where demographics can be useful.
    It seems to me that publishing needs to be cost effective and run more like a real retail business. Returning massive amounts of books for full refunds just because? Not good business.

    Like

  3. Dayle Avatar

    I do understand your frustration, Nicole. But if the publisher did not do this, the risk would be thrown onto the bookstores. Now, you could say “fine, that’s the way most businesses work.” But look at what would happen.
    The bookstore would be forced to buy only books it KNEW it could sell. They would rarely take a chance on a new author. The bookstore would only include sure things: Patterson, Koontz, King, Rowling, etc.
    Publishers would also lose presence. Right now a stand with 30 books from a new debut author that catches the customers eye would dissapear. The bookstore would replace that with only the best selling authors.
    ( The reading public would be cut out of the browsing for new authors loop. Right now they are given a smorgasboard (I’ll check spelling later) and they get to decide which new novel is gonna breakthrough. If you cut out returns, they’ll be given a smaller fast food menu with only 1 – 8 to choose from and little dayle will not be on that list.
    I know you can give examples where this wouldn’t be the case, where a book can breakthrough anyway, but money is spent on highest recognizable percentage probabilities, not crap shoots – be them percieved or not.
    What I would like to see is a shared risk. Maybe the publisher could give 50% back on the return. However, competition reigns. If one publisher bucks the trend to gain shelf space, the rest will fall in line.
    This practice is not done in a vacuum.
    Sidenote: keep in mind that many businesses go out of business not because they weren’t making a profit, but because they invested in something new that didn’t pan out or expanded too fast.

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    Dayle, you make good points. However, bookstores ARE closing, dropping like flies as a matter of fact. So, even with the generous refunds, something isn’t working.
    As you well know, we as “unknowns” are in the crosshairs of this biz, so to criticize their policies which supposedly “favor” new/debut authors also doesn’t make good sense, but retail is still retail. This practice is absurd. Quite frankly, the onus should be on the individual store. They should have more knowledge of their product(s), and they should have sections for debut authors not just new releases. If the novels are ordered for them, they just stock the shelves and are no more informed, unless they choose to be, than the consumer. That’s no way to sell a product. Granted, a manager can’t keep up with every book in the store, but this is where the sales reps can actively participate at a store level and be in tune with the average reader–which I think it’s fairly evident CBA reps are not. We are not all bonnet book fans or KK fans (nothing wrong with these books or authors). A huge number of readers are eliminated in the niche markets. The internet is exposing this, but the mantra remains: these books don’t sell in CBA. Like men’s fiction, specfic. Baloney. They buy them in the secular fiction because they aren’t found or marketed well in CBA stores.
    Anyway, enough of my ranting. Businesses go out of business because they don’t make a profit. If what they invested in doesn’t pan out, that simply means they took a loss they couldn’t sustain by their profits. Books are items to sell. Just like the knickknacks, pictures, cards, etc. JMO

    Like

  5. Dayle Avatar

    I do agree with your idealism, Nicole, but unfortunately practicalities get in the way.
    My point about businesses going out of business for other reasons is quite common. You may be looking at it in a micro instead of macro pov.
    Let’s say hypothetically borders stores actually make profit. If they left them alone it would be okay, but corps try to grow at all costs so they may buy a chain of sushi restaurants or start a financing company which fails and wipes them out and causes a liquidation of all assets including the bookstores.
    In this hypothetical situation, the closing of the bookstores would not be an accurate measure of the health of the book business.
    I personally think if bookstores are hurting it’s because of a societal habit shift. I buy most of my books from amazon. It’s cheaper and easier. If I had a local christian bookstore, I’d buy there to support them but alas we do not.
    Our local “national chain book store” seems to be doing quite well and has an extensive Christian novel section — I’d guess 30ft of shelves — but it’s all 25% or so higher than amazon. And they also sell pornography so that kind of bugs me.

    Like

  6. Nicole Avatar

    It’s interesting you use the corporate example, Dayle, since the buying out of “Christian” publishing houses is rampant. Thomas Nelson recently, Howard Books, Multnomah, etc. To secular conglomerates. Some corps buy and/or operate sub-level or failing companies so they can have tax write-offs to offset their huge profits.
    As long as the bookstores can’t compete with Amazon prices, which translates to making a profit with their sales, they can return their entire inventory and it won’t make them a viable company. If they’re in it to sell books in the brick and mortar format, then somehow they’re going to have to compete with online buying. If this means huge warehousing, then they have to consider it. If it means taking less of a mark-up, then they’re going to have to consider it. If a consumer wants a product, they’re far more willing to buy it on the spot than wait for it to ship. Availability is primo. However, if availability means we have to pay 30-40% more for the book even without shipping, forget it.
    It’s not idealism, I don’t think, Dayle. It seems more like sound business practices to me. The refund process that Robert described isn’t a benefit to anyone really. Not even the bookstores if all they’re doing is housing books on their shelves which don’t sell until they get the go ahead to return them. Sounds like a no-win situation to me.

    Like

Leave a reply to Nicole Cancel reply