If you could change five things (or less) in CBA publishing, what would they (it) be? (Unabridged and unedited.)
From Author J. Mark Bertrand:
There are plenty of things I'd change, but the more I thought about it, the more I realized there's one area that constantly undermines change. So I figured I'd change that …. š
Iām limiting myself to one wave of the magic wand, but itās a big one. The change that would enable so many other changes:
Letās change the marketing macrocosm. Book marketing is now āopen source,ā meaning itās up to the author to do more and more of the work. In some ways, it always has been. Marketing support makes all the difference in a bookās success. While support doesnāt guarantee a book will hit the bestseller list, lack of support guarantees it wonāt, exceptional flukes notwithstanding. Thanks to limited resources, publishers canāt support every book as if itās destined for immortality. In the old days, this reality meant that a lot of good books would be doomed to obscurity. Then along came blogs and social networking, bringing with them the possibility that authors could do for themselves what publishers couldnāt or wouldnāt. So here we are.
Whatās changed, though, isnāt the What or How of marketing, just the Who. In the old days, a frustrated mid-lister could complain that everything would have been different if only the publisher had given him marketing support. Now itās his own fault. He should have had a more successful blog or posted some viral videos. He should have made himself a celebrity.
The old way wasnāt perfect, but Iām afraid what weāre replacing it with will be even worse. Do publishers need better marketing people? Absolutely. Iām just not convinced theyāre going to find them by unloading the problem onto authors.
So hereās what I would change, if only I could. Iād move the question of how books will be marketed back into the marketing department, where Iād start gauging success by how well the department sells the books that donāt sell themselves. While I would expect a lot of involvement from authors, and would invest more resources in those willing to match my efforts, my marketing people would be driving the story. Like some World War II code breakers, theyād be on a twenty-four/seven quest to discover how to market books in the twenty-first century.
If we changed this one thing, weād make it easier to change everything. The biggest obstacle to change is failure. When books succeed, we get copycats. If the copycats succeed we get trends. Success drives change, only it tends to be capricious. Good marketing increases the potential for success as much (if not more) than good writing. If you want change anywhere, marketing is a great place to start.
To be continued . . .
Leave a comment