Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

Ambiguous: 1.Susceptible to multiple interpretation 2.Doubtful or uncertain

 

Synonyms: equivocal, obscure, obtuse, vague, cryptic, enigmatic

 

Average: (Discarding the mathematical definitions) Typical, usual

 

Synonyms: medium, mediocre, fair, middling, indifferent, run-of-the-mill, so-so, tolerable

 

Most of us remember how to establish an “average” when presented with several numbers. We recognize it’s the general middle of those numbers after conceding the high and low ends of examples. That average could be accused of being ambiguous, especially when the high is very high and the low is very low.

 

We’ve talked here numerous times about “the average reader”. I don’t think we’ve ever talked about “the average writer”. Far more difficult to quantify unless we take inventory of a specific group of average readers and tally up their favorite authors. Might that work to establish an ambiguous average?

 

I have talked to many, many readers of all kinds of genres. Likewise, I’ve talked to my share of writers, also of many kinds of genres. There is a significant gap—more like a chasm—between what a reader expects or desires and what a writer expects to deliver as well as what a writer expects or desires. I think it’s safe to say there might even be another even bigger chasm between what a lot of readers and writers expect and desire and what a publisher is set to deliver. In fact, occasionally it’s like selling the late 60’s cause and effects to those of the late 80’s crowd. Not an easy sell. Why? Because they can’t really relate.

 

I’ve been fairly outspoken concerning what I feel is a disconnect between publishers/booksellers and the bigger needs of an untapped audience. With the discourse on this blog about desired change in the Christian publishing industry made not only by readers, writers, and a number of professionals in the biz, it’s fairly obvious there are a lot of people who aren’t getting what they desire from CBA. Now how many “a lot” actually is must not be considered worthy of speculation by some of the powers that be evidenced by the reluctance to grow and expand their product to reach these consumers—at least not in a timely manner.

 

Visionaries assess the climate of business and dare to be bold in their ventures. So we all know it’s a rough economic time which will probably persist until 2013 when some of the government spending can be eliminated and reduced. Hopefully. Now many businesses stick with what they’ve offered, reducing some prices, and hold steady in hopes of better times in the future. But visionary businesses look to gain new appeal and carefully amplify their reach, hoping to attract those who’ve never tapped into what they have to offer by expanding their product line. In doing so they gain an additional clientele by offering more to many while still keeping what they’ve got for those who’re used to their basics.

 

We see some evidence of “visionary” in CBA publishing with Broadman & Holman, Thomas Nelson, Hachette Book Group in their FaithWords imprint, and occasional bumps from other CBA publishers but the slight evidence doesn’t calculate to real vision nor to profit nor to any change in public rhetoric from Christian publishing. And most of these publishers have chosen to do their versions of trendy Amish fiction to cash in on that market share. Not blaming them for that. In fact, I’m not blaming them for anything really. It’s just disappointing that they can’t see beyond the appeal to this ambiguous average audience to reach the rest of potential readers.   

 

 

God, you are sovereign. Nothing is news to you. You know past, present, future. You lead. When we’re in the right place, we follow you. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Posted in

6 responses to “The Ambiguous Average”

  1. Lynda Avatar

    Nicole, as I read this, I’m thinking about the kindle/e-reader revolution that we are on the precipice of, and how that might impact the publishing business. Not just in terms of recouping their investment, but in terms of reducing the risk on novels that break from the “norm”.
    Record labels stuck their head in the sand and became decimated by the digital download revolution. Of course, there are still CD’s being bought, but it’s few and far between, and one of the biggest money makers for any music artist is cell phone ring tones.
    This is an opportunity for the Netflix of Publishers to emerge, and truly take advantage of this potential trend. Otherwise, with a nominal software investment, authors are going to be able to self-publish and sell their downloadable books off their own blogs/websites. And, of course, the economics of spending $4-8 on a kindle edition, versus $20-$30 is an no-brainer right now.
    This is a larger conversation than in a comment box, but your post has my brain stirring.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    Lynda, the e-readers have produced a revolution in publishing. Literary agents have had to regroup to negotiate a suitable royalty for their clients. Self or custom-published authors can either pay to have their books adapted to all the different e-reader formats or possibly learn to do it themselves. Profits could make that investment totally worthwhile for writers.
    Print on Demand began the revolution and e-readers continue the process. The only carry-over “problem” remains marketing the books. Pointing people toward purchasing the book still means finding the key type(s) of promotion to get potential readers to invest whether in trade paper or e-reader formats.
    There are some forward-thinking people in Christian publishing–most of them former editors for CBA publishers–who recognize this new opportunity and are setting the pace behind the scenes in this revolutionary approach and movement.
    Thanks for stopping by, Lynda. See ya soon. 😉

    Like

  3. Brenda Avatar

    I have a dumb question. I try to learn what I can about the publishing industry and still feel like I don’t understand half of it.
    Is there one “go to” source for tracking sales of books? I know Amazon has their version, individual publishers obviously track (and seem to jealously protect) their sales numbers, but is their one coordinated data storehouse for such figures? I’m thinking not but am not certain.
    The reason I ask that is I wonder how that will be tracked as more and more authors abandon traditional publishing to e-publish their own books?
    Maybe it doesn’t even matter. But I’m a data geek and always wonder about these things. 😎

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    Not a dumb question at all, Brenda. I know Brandilyn Collins covered this topic on her old blog “Forensics and Faith”. I’m sure you can find it in the archives there. I know I can’t give you a definitive answer to satisfy the data geek in you. 😉 And it’s actually a very good question especially with the e-readers entering the fray.
    And I’ve heard rumblings of how difficult it is for authors to track their sales–especially with the send-back policy for books that CBA stores “buy” but return if they don’t sell them in a certain time period.

    Like

  5. Lynda Avatar

    Marketing is always the challenge, is it not? It seems to me that harnessing social media is going to be a key tactic in general, but specifically in reaching electronically inclined readers.

    Like

  6. Nicole Avatar

    Marketing seems to be the Catch-22 of the publishing industry. The bestsellers get the top funding in marketing yet they require less marketing because they have an avid and established audience waiting for their new releases. The mid-list or new authors must manufacture a major portion of their marketing plan even though many–or possibly most–of them have little knowledge of how to sell a product, even their own novels. In book proposals the “How will you market your book?” is an important part of the package you submit, and since the industry has yet to figure out HOW to market fiction with the professionals on their staffs, it’s unfair to expect an author to have figured out what will work with any given piece.
    Even the social networking done for communicating with readers, establishing relationships, and promoting their wares results in undetermined success/failure for selling books. So I guess technically it could be listed as a failure since there’s no credible statistics to prove it’s profitable.

    Like

Leave a reply to Brenda Cancel reply