Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

Since writing is considered one of the arts along with music, dance, drawing and painting, sculpture, and whatever else you might include in this most generous of creative terms, I’d like to point out its difference to the other vehicles for expressing creative abilities, geniuses, or the lack thereof . . .

 

I know this could provoke disagreement but I state this as only my opinion about writing. Unlike the other “arts”, writing does not “evolve”. Writing, regardless of how it began and what it’s become, has its basis in words. Words come in different languages and symbols, but they’ve always been designed to communicate, to illustrate, to define, to suggest, and to eventually be read.

 

The other arts have morphed through innumerable changes in tools, in equipment, in the ever-changing landscapes, the regions of peoples and their advancements—or failures to do so—and the choices available for use in the expressions of artists.

 

The one thing these arts have in common is the desire to communicate. However, words serve communication as their sole purpose and this becomes the basis for the art of writing.

 

We could discuss the ancient trends or the current styles and all those that have been used in between, but the objective remains the same. Some have written in diaries, hidden them away only to have them discovered and celebrated or decried by future generations. Nevertheless, those secret words communicated the thought processes of individuals who chose to write them; committed them to a form for later reflection or to express the emotion of that moment. The words become art or treatises or heresies or tragic recollections, but they communicate something good, bad, or indifferent.

 

When writing transcends to “art”, we can usually find those who reject each piece selected for such acclaim, and in this way all of the other arts concur there is always the subjectivity of those who observe, judge, and often partake of each skill. There is no pleasing the entire audience of art—or artists. The fateful journey of each artist takes odd twists and the results of these travels often lead to tragic ends or joyful ecstasies. The writer cannot be pigeon-holed in his efforts, his intentions, or his psyche. His unique approach can be smothered in self-loathing, embraced with great passion, or methodically outlined and administered with determined practicality.

 

As a writer, I’m not laying claim to my writing as art. I know it communicates. I know I hope it is read. I know I labor over some pieces and not so much over others. I care for the words. I write with passion. I am one writer amidst thousands. Unnoticed for the most part but recognized by the Lord of all creation. I’m doing what He asked, and the results, whatever they will be, belong to Him.

 

The art of writing hasn’t changed. It’s as meaningful and thought-provoking as it’s always been and will always be. Words cannot be underestimated. After all . . .

 

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God . . .

 

John 1:1 (NIV)

 

 

Father, may my words honor you, my writing given back to you, a meager gift. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

 

Posted in

9 responses to “The Art of Writing . . .”

  1. Brenda Avatar

    Words are so powerful! There’s nothing like that feel you get when once in a great, great, great while, you pick up a book that has the “stuff”, a book where those words are put together in a way that you think about the story long after you finish it. That is just too cool.
    All of these arts have in common being very time consuming for the artist as well. One of the things I’ve always wanted to do is learn to play the banjo, but it would require the same time investment as writing and there’s just no way.
    Sigh. So many pursuits. So little time.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    The time factor is a good point, Brenda. And most likely the better the book, etc., the more time spent working on it, huh?

    Like

  3. Lynda Avatar

    Nicole, as I read this, I’m wondering if I agree with you or not?  It’s possible, too, that I missed the point. I’m not sure that writing hasn’t evolved the way other artistic mediums have.
    Defining it thusly: Writing, regardless of how it began and what it’s become, has its basis in words, I think you can apply that to all art forms.
    I work primarily in a medium that has seen dramatic change in how photos are captured, shared, modified, and sold. Even still, photography is still capturing light to create an image that speaks universally. Sculpture is still an image out of substance. Oils, waters, and pastels are still used to create “paintings”. Performance artists still use voice and body. Movies still combine writing, acting, lighting, and motion capture.
    I see the impact of technology on writing in a similar vein, and now certainly in the world of e-readers and most critically chat and text language (which as much as I don’t like it, is impacting a generation of people). As I’ve been reading some mid-20th Century novels lately, I’m discovering, much like watching a movie from the 70’s, what’s important to communicate, and how it’s communicated is very different from modern writing. Culture to culture it’s different as well, some cultures think nothing of adding a chapter of prose or poetry into the middle of a narrative, books written in the “Me” generation are influenced by existentialism and are routinely self-referential.
    This comment is getting too long, but my brain was stirred so I needed to get my thoughts down. One thing I do think is truly unique about writing is that with all other artistic mediums, they are visual or audible, but writing is not. Therefore, it is not immediate. It takes a consuming amount of time to write, and a large amount of time to read and thus process it. The way a story is crafted, you can’t just appreciate the prologue and discount the whole of the story; it takes a story until the last sentence to make its point. To me, that is what is so different about this form of art.

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    Lynda, I understand the point you’re making, and you made it well. However, you are still describing methods of delivery, style, and culture in your analysis. And while I agree with all of your examples, I stand by my premise as far as the evolution of writing itself, the root of writing, if you will, is, was, and I assume will always be to communicate using words. The methods used, the cultures from which those words and inspirations spring or originate will continue to be in a state of flux, but words communicate and writing is the servant of those words.
    Thanks for taking the time on this “snow day” to communicate your thoughts. They’re valid, but I stand by my premise. 😉

    Like

  5. Lynda Avatar

    Granted I did tangent off beyond the definition of words=writing! smiles I still fail to see how that is different from other forms of art, though? How do you see other forms of art evolving beyond their core definitions?

    Like

  6. Nicole Avatar

    I will concede that the suggested examples you gave for writing have evolved along with the deliveries of the other arts. However, people still write at the most basic levels, they use words that have existed for eons even though many thousands of new words have been added to the mix. The objective is to communicate at some level. Writing can still be done with pencil and paper and doesn’t require new means to compose a manuscript or a masterpiece.
    Take music. The variations to record it, to perform it, to use it at almost any level, advances even at primitive levels. Those who advance it to performance and/or those who desire to entertain generally strive for the best equipment and sound, unwilling to revisit or rely on older means.
    It could be semantics here, Lynda, because I do understand what you’re getting at.

    Like

  7. Lynda Avatar

    I’m still not convinced! But, I really don’t take issue with your point, either. Just got my brain stirring and thinking about art, which I love!

    Like

  8. Nicole Avatar

    But it was fun to discuss! 😉

    Like

  9. Lynda Avatar

    Definitely fun!

    Like

Leave a reply to Lynda Cancel reply