Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

How many times have you heard the phrase in the title at church board meetings, committee meetings, the publishing industry? Change: “You know it don’t come easy.”

 

The publishing industry is notorious for moving slowly. However, the challenges of e-publishing have engineered some movement urging the powers-that-be in the biz to get rid of their 4-cylinder approach with the “tried and true” methodology and upgrade to a dyno-chipped 8-cylinder if they don’t want to get left in the dust by authors deciding to do it themselves.

 

Can you imagine if Karen Kingsbury, Ted Dekker, and a few other big name authors bagged the traditional publishing companies and elected to self-publish their future novels? Both of these authors are marketing machines so there’s very little chance their reading clientele would drop off even slightly. Granted, their publishers pay the big dollars for marketing their books—in keeping with the generally accepted practice of the big names getting the majority of the marketing dollars—but it’s a well known fact that Karen Kingsbury has also invested thousands of dollars in marketing her books which of course makes her a perennial favorite with her publisher(s).

 

Stop and think about the mechanics (don’t worry: I understand this part) of creating a book. The services of outfits like WinePress provide cover design, typesetting, and even e-reader adaptation. Their new packages include the requirement for edited work—they employ professional freelancers just like the royalty presses. Usually, depending on how much editing is necessary, their product is produced and shipped faster than traditional publishers, and the author is consulted and informed of every wonderful element of their book all along the way. A project manager is assigned, and off they go! An author can elect to do straight e-publishing, POD, or collect the bound printed books which equal or surpass, as far as appearance, the quality of those produced by royalty publishers.

 

And then we come to the bane of all publishing: the marketing of these novels. We’ve discussed here many times how difficult it is to pinpoint what sells fiction. Word of mouth is the one “given” according to nearly everyone who’s professionally tried to market literature. However, an author could die before the word of mouth penetrates the masses with sterling recommendations to read his/her book!

 

I know being traditionally published appears to be the stamp of approval assigned to one’s writing. It’s an affirmation that professionals approve and have given value to one’s work. I don’t disagree. But previously contracted authors are now without contracts and considering what that means to their author status. The dabbling in thoughts of the smeared and degraded self-publishing has begun to raise its forbidden head to peak over the high razor-wired walls and assert its availability. Some fire their Uzis at first glance with scathing remarks about the “lack of quality” and other insults. However, production-wise, the books that come from places like WinePress are more tightly managed than those from most royalty publishers. Writing-wise? Who knows? They go through an editing process just like traditionally published books. I’ve read some poor royalty-published novels in the last year . . .   

 

Anyway, at least there are choices for those who are tired of “the way we’ve always done it”.

 

 

God, you’re so generous to your people. You take us down roads of your design and what a journey it is! What a joy when we comply. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.     

Posted in

9 responses to ““The way we’ve always done it . . .””

  1. Brenda Jackson Avatar

    Nicole said: “Stop and think about the mechanics (don’t worry: I understand this part)”
    LOL!!!!!
    As I expected, after the firestorm of the Barry Eisler thing hit the fan in the last week or so, now folks tied to the trad pub trade are coming out with their dire warnings about how self pub is not a get rich quick scheme. I understand the need they feel to give people a reality check, but just as I tire of hearing all self pub raked over the coal because of some occasional poor quality work (and I agree about poor quality being able to slip through the trad pub gate), it gets very tiresome to hear these dire warnings.
    My reaction is the same in both cases. Give people a little credit here. Yes, there will always be a few people who will dash off a story and assume that first draft is God’s gift to the world, but most authors, even if they don’t understand publishing backwards and forwards (and who does!) try their best to navigate these complicated waters, no matter which way they go.
    When I have time, my homework assignment to myself is to see if any of these authors who once pubbed in trad pub and then switched to self pub have ever shared a comparison of how much money they spent out of pocket under a traditional publisher vs. self publishing.
    That’s the bottom line to me. Whichever way I ultimately go, can I afford to be published? I mean seriously. If you don’t get much support in trad pub and have to foot much of the bill yourself, what then is the reason for doing that and not self?
    To some people that may not be a big deal. But when it quite literally takes everything I earn in my day job to pay the basic rent, electric, groceries, etc. this is a very real, significant issue. There is no dropping two grand for this and another 2 grand for that, all in the name of publication.
    Of course the other obstacle that seems obvious is that if you self publish, chances are to succeed you need to keep a lot of material out there, and that’s a whole other problem to work out. LOL!

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    There is quite frankly no way to market books without spending money. Is there any way to do anything creatively without eventually spending dollars and cents? It’s a matter of how much.
    One of the most expensive parts of getting a book ready for publication is the editing–especially if it comes out of pocket. For these reasons, if you can get a royalty paying publisher to contract your work–and there’s no guarantee you haven’t already paid for editing when you submit it–then it’s nice to only have to look forward to the expense of marketing. It’s how to market that still presents a huge challenge.
    If an author elects to do an e-book and forego a print book, they can get it formatted for under a $1000 and with the right arrangement can make up to 70% profit or as little as 30% on each sale. Yes, they still have to sell the books.
    So what makes sense? As I said, now there are definite choices/alternatives.
    Thanks for your thoughts, Brenda.

    Like

  3. Brenda Anderson Avatar

    Well said, Nicole. I see this topic as becoming more relevant as the years go, on & self-publishing becomes less of a pariah. I’m not ready to leap into the self-pubbed pool, but I applaud those who do as they’re paving the way for everyone else.
    My friend, Jerri, wrote about his very thing at her blog today too: http://jerriledford.com/?p=43.

    Like

  4. Jerri L Ledford Avatar

    I do think we’re in the midst of a major shift in publishing. From my perspective, as both an author and a reader, I think it’s a great thing. Sure, the ease with which a writer can put their work in front of people will (in the beginning) result in more lower quality books reaching the masses. The flip side of that is that serious authors will take the time to work through the publishing process to produce high-quality books. And ultimately, readers will decide what’s worthy and what’s not.
    I am most excited about that concept. That READERS not acquisitions editors will decide what books are worth paying for. Suddenly, there’s a whole new world opening up!

    Like

  5. Brenda Jackson Avatar

    Which is why I’ve not been in a hurry to submit my manuscript. I’m not looking for a get rich quick scheme. But I’m also not looking for my writing habit to make me poorer.
    So that would seem to make one problem more easily resolved–while I decide how much I want to do on my own, while I look at whether or not I want to become more savvy and learn e-formatting myself, and those million other choices, I can keep building up my body of work.
    It seems to me it’s going to become essential for writers to have an additional publishing industry skill besides writing to survive. Writers in some cases will probably need to band together in coops to take advantage of different skills. And if you’re going to do that, you have to HAVE different skills besides the writing.

    Like

  6. Brenda Jackson Avatar

    Jerri, I just hopped over and read your post. Good article. That is the most exciting thing to me–getting more reading choices now that writers can have more control over when, where and how they publish. That old “nobody will read such and such” is old.
    If readers and writers of niche markets can learn to hook up in that bast blob that is cyberspace, it’s going to be really cool for them both.

    Like

  7. Nicole Avatar

    Jerri, I couldn’t agree more. And great post you put up on this subject.
    Brenda A., thanks for the reference to Jerri’s post. And, yeah, it takes time to work out what an individual decides is best for them.

    Like

  8. Brenda Jackson Avatar

    VAST blob. Sigh…

    Like

  9. Nicole Avatar

    Brenda J., I can see co-ops becoming a reality. I’m anxious to see what exactly Mick Silva’s up to with his new site under construction. I know he’s going to be offering services at a reduced cost in some capacity and have contributors from many areas of publishing.
    It’s a fascinating time to be in publishing.

    Like

Leave a comment