Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

It’s personally amusing that my first read of a Tom Clancy novel turns out to be Dead or Alive which runs 950 pages. Me: the one who exalts long novels and wrote my first one that resulted in 744 pages including the Glossary of Terms. So what did I think of paddling through that many pages? Not too bad.

 

Dead or Alive is a contemporary thriller in the vein of Vince Flynn stories. With “spooks” and politicians and Islamic terrorists, an independent group of men, including former President Jack Ryan Sr.’s son Jack Junior, search for those terrorists the administration in this novel seek to placate with fancy diplomacy and the reduction and/or replacement of professionals in the CIA and other important places in the government with those who know nothing about what is required to keep this country safe. Sound familiar? Yeah, I thought so too.

 

This independent group seeks out the best of the Special Ops, Law Enforcement, CIA types who are considering retirement or frustrated with the limitations placed upon them by their government when the enemy has no such guards over their conduct to destroy the USA. Using their contacts and familiarity with other clandestine operatives and organizations in the world, this small group can accomplish what sanctioned operatives sometimes cannot. They operate totally under the radar and only answer to their peers.

 

As you might expect from a novel this size, the tedium of explanations for different radioactive parts, the voyages to unheard of and desolate places with the outcome predisposed and assured, and the few meandering and vulgar musings of a high-priced call girl, not to mention the probably accurate descriptions of the Arabs’ thoughts who hire the women for their “physical needs”, all lead to some perhaps unnecessary verbiage. This is a secular/general market book so there are no restrictions on language or vulgarity, and all things considered, in those respects it could’ve been worse. Plenty of f-bombs and some lewd imagery and words, so I don’t recommend it for everyone.

 

An antagonist equivalent to a bin Laden type, the “Emir” cannot be located, and the e-chatter has gone silent which is, according to Jack Jr., a good indicator that something big is in the works and possibly imminent. With Jack’s and another of the group’s geek’s discoveries the team takes off in twos to various parts of the world to capture some of the discovered evil members of the terrorist group (URC) to learn the plans and location of the Emir.

 

The covert operations are the most entertaining and exciting parts of the story, and the fact that none of them are discovered make the actions that much more fulfilling to read. Realistic in its portrayal of two kinds/sides of politics and government as well as the dangerous and sometimes tragic world of covert operations bring this contemporary story to life.

 

Writing-wise I found the use of nicknames and real names used for the same characters confusing at times in keeping track of who was who. Small thing really, but being unfamiliar with them kept me off-balance and stopping to reassess their identities. The POV slippages and opting into omniscient will no doubt bother some readers—though probably only those who write.

 

For those political/spy thriller readers who appreciate a lot of technical data streamed through stories, this is the book for you.

 

I’ll tell you the part of the novel I liked the least. In fact I’ll quote it for you, stated by one of the primary characters John Clark, a go-to guy in Special Ops. In putting his thoughts together with a few other incidents and nuances in the novel, I’m not sure if this is just the character’s thinking or if this is Tom Clancy’s opinion. Frankly, it bothered me.

 

***SPOILER ALERT***

 

Clark had never met a bad Saudi. There were a few he knew well from his life in the CIA, people from whom he’d learned the language. They’d all been religious, part of the conservative Wahhabi branch of Sunni Islam. Not unlike Southern Baptists in the thoroughness of their devotion. That was fine with him. He’d been to a mosque once and watched the exercise of the religion, careful to stay inconspicuously in the back—it had been a language lesson, for the most part, but the sincerity of their religious beliefs was evident. He’d talked religion with his Saudi friends and found nothing the least bit objectionable in it. Saudis were hard to make as close friends, but a true Saudi friend would step in front of the bullet for you. Their religion’s rules on such things as hospitality were admirable indeed. And Islam prohibited racism, something Christianity had unfortunately left out.

 

***SPOILER CONCLUDED***

 

Obviously, “John Clark” or possibly Tom Clancy has no clue what Christianity truly is or what the word of God has to say about racism. Not to be naïve about seeing prejudice in the church. Nevertheless: prejudice is not a part of Christianity; it’s a part of humanity.  

 

Written in partnership with U.S. Navy veteran Grant Blackwood who also co-authored two novels with Clive Cussler and authored his own Briggs Tanner Series, Dead or Alive by Tom Clancy will provide a detailed story about what it takes by covert operatives to defeat a powerful, persistent, and remarkably patient enemy.

 

                            418+AF0-XsL__AA160_ 

 

 

Father, I have no idea what Tom Clancy’s “religious” status is, but I know the only thing that matters in this world and the next is a relationship with Jesus. I pray that Tom would have one and that you would continue to enlighten his writing. In the Name of Jesus, Amen. 

Posted in

4 responses to “Either . . . Dead or Alive”

  1. dayle Avatar

    I read one Clancy novel and it was plenty. Too long, WAY TOO MANY characters to keep track of. I’ll never read another one. Some of the film adaptations have been excellent, though.
    As to the quote: There are some in the US who think that way, but not usually those who meet and have daily contact with a lot of Saudis. Unless the character is a hater of women’s rights, I’d guess this is Clancy’s views as diluted from distance and leftist ivy league cocktail parties. But I could be wrong of course.
    If the character had never been to Saudi Arabia and is baseing his conclusions on personal anecdotal evidence from a few friends in the States, then statement qualified by “met” is plausible. But being in the CIA should give him access to the “bad” Saudis and thus a more thoughtful examination than say a walled up professor at harvard.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    I agree about the film adaptations, and this one provides another source.
    I kept up with the characters alright in this one except for the terrorists in several locations.
    This operative gave no evidence of being a woman hater and was married. It’s hard to ignore their (Wahhabi and Islam in general) “prejudice” and discrimination toward women, so I don’t know how he managed to find that not objectionable–which this story basically reinforced with the Arab solicitations (and private comments) of hookers/call girls.
    I think this will be my first and last Clancy novel too, Dayle. I see where his new one is equally huge. And you know me, Dayle, I love long books, but not just for the sake of being long. I don’t want to read them feeling like there’s a bunch of superfluous stuff in them. And I’m not talking about specifically “taking away from the story” but rather just over indulging a topic within the story.

    Like

  3. Jessica Thomas Avatar

    Sheesh. I’m tired just thinking about it.
    I suppose the fact that his novels are popular is a positive reflection of literacy in this country. Plenty of people are willing to slog through a long book. Maybe our attention spans have gotten a bad rap.
    I admire his ability to be able to make all that stuff seem real. I certainly couldn’t do it. But, I can’t say the storyline intrigues me, especially not, considering how long the book is.

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    I’ve long held that real readers don’t care how long a novel is–they just want to read a good story from an author. Of course some readers feel their time is limited so they look for quick(er) reads which is acceptable and understandable, but it shouldn’t mean or determine that ALL novels must be of limited lengths.
    I think it’s interesting too that I would assume most of Clancy’s readers are men with a good share of women who enjoy political thrillers such as myself. The ever-repeated “men don’t read fiction” mantra isn’t borne out with Flynn and Clancy and Cussler and others.

    Like

Leave a reply to Jessica Thomas Cancel reply