Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

Two blogs presented the ongoing but interesting conundrum of "preachiness" and "truth – whatever that might be". Take a look:

 

http://spirereviews.blogspot.com/2011/11/preaching-to-choir.html#comment

 

http://novelmatters.com/  (Post by Ariel)

 

Opinions vary on these subjects and judgments can be made whether justified or not. Christians and non-Christians both go radical on these topics if unrestrained.

I opt for the contrasts in my own writing. I don't like to paint the clichΓ©d Christian characters because I find them to be uninteresting and unreal. Yes, unreal. Few things come off easy in this life on planet earth. I've known those who God has blessed with an enhanced joy, but they also demonstrate depth in understanding sorrow. Their joy is complete in Jesus, but anything that is complete in Jesus knows sorrow.

Whether or not you write quirky, serious, adventurous, withdrawn, spunky, cold, mean, or humorous characters, you must write them truthfully. Male or female, they must capture the essence of their gender and by that I don't mean feminine must be girly-girl or masculine must be macho. I mean the author must view them and translate them at their heart level, at who they are inside and out which can sometimes conflict. Characters drive the story. Without compelling characters many readers will abandon the story. Some will not because they're used to seeing plastic people in ordinary stories and don't expect much from either other than forgettable entertainment.

So many choices present themselves to authors and consequently readers. Some readers desire the gut-wrenching reality of trial, error, failure. Others want the lighter fluff with simple solutions. Whatever the writing styles, the preaching or the lack thereof can be a factor in telling the truth. Some like faith issues under the radar, some prefer the organic approach when exposing them, and still others like sermonizing. The irony was found in those who detest preaching/sermonizing in literature often raved about The Shack which is one long sermon.

The conundrums of writing and reading that thing called "Christian" fiction . . .     

 

Father, all that truly matters is what you desire from each one of us. Help us to deliver what you assign to us. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

 

Posted in

4 responses to “Truth and Consequences?”

  1. Brenda Anderson Avatar

    Thanks for sharing the Novel Matters link. I hadn’t read that post. She has a unique point to consider.
    I’m with you in saying that authenticity in storytelling is absolutely necessary. For the story to ring true, I have to believe that the characters are real. The story line also has to be believable.
    When that’s accomplished, the level of preachiness probably won’t matter to me.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    If some characters are “preachy” because that’s who they are, then it won’t bother me as long as that character is well-established and defined. It inevitably comes down to that authentic writing, doesn’t it, Bren?

    Like

  3. dayle Avatar

    I think some authors misconstrue the need to have flawed characters as having charcters that possess some blinding moral shortcoming.
    The fact is there are good people in the world. I know, I’m one of them. πŸ™‚
    Because we all think we are better than we actually are or we strive to be and therefore want to identify with “good” characters, I personally think the best protags are people who are better than us (the reader), yet possess our vulnerability and either find a way to overcome them or uses them to defeat the bad guy or accomplish his goal.
    I think vulverability is the key. In suspense or thrillers, this usually means the protag is outclassed by the antag. (i.e. the decent father who may have camped out once who has to take on a gestapo/special forces type villain who has intruded in one of his loved ones lives.)
    disclaimier: I didn’t put much thought into this so I may change my mind soon. πŸ™‚

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    “I think vulnerability is the key.” I agree with this, Dayle. Even the amazing Mitch Rapp proved his vulnerability, particularly in Consent to Kill which I think is Vince’s finest writing.
    It takes a very good writer to take an unlikable protag and make us care about him/her. Not many can do it effectively.

    Like

Leave a reply to Brenda Anderson Cancel reply