Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

   
0_groups_and_outings_wardie_school_class_1950s

You who know me can imagine what a stunning conclusion it was when I finally figured out my novels and manuscripts in progress would probably not fit into the current CBA fiction. A longtime avid and abundant reader of Christian fiction, you'd think I would've noted the restrictive nature of the stories I read. But being obviously slow on the uptake, I thought these stories could include a little more pop, a few more dashes of realism.

Mike Duran in this post made some astute observations about the majority of CBA authors. Those who comprise this stable have a lot in common besides their gender and age range. There is a type of writing that is produced by these talented individuals and their editors for their particular publishing houses. That's not to say they're identical in their styles and certainly not in their voices, but there are far more similarities in the books produced than there are differences. In other words there is a uniformity of language and lack of certain circumstances that identify them with a type of work.

Now is that a bad thing? Not necessarily. Then it's a good thing? Well. Not necessarily.

Restrictions and requirements set a tone and determine the direction publishers want to take their products in hopes of appealing to their "masses", their niche groups in the market. And this is certainly and adamantly their right. I've wondered "aloud" here multiple times (as Mike voiced) why this is enough. Isn't there room for a bit of stretching in this market?

Nevertheless, I am who I am as a writer, but that puts me in a crazy place. Kind of un-typed for where I thought I belonged.

 

Lord, you know where I am, where I need to be, and where you want me. I want to be where you want me. End of story. 😉 In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Posted in

4 responses to “Type-ing”

  1. Brenda Anderson Avatar

    I wish there was room for a little more realism, more distinct voices. I see that slowly seep in, but not as quickly as I’d like.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    True, Bren. True.

    Like

  3. Karin Kaufman Avatar

    Maybe the solution is to write non-CBA fiction but write it with a Christian world view (e.g., morals matter)? My next book is going to be a non-CBA-type thriller. Not that I’m part of the CBA world anyway, but even so, even from outside that world, I feel its restrictions.
    For me the problem is also the marketplace. If you write explicitly Christian fiction, you’re limiting your audience. If you don’t write Christian romance, which rules Christian fiction (I like to call it the Romance Mafia), you’re limiting your audience further. It’s hard enough to sell books–why limit yourself from the get-go?

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    Many insiders who want to branch out call Christian fiction itself and some of the writers therein the “Christian bubble”. As you might assume, this has multiple meanings.
    Cultivating the audience for your own style of novels is the biggest problem I see, Karin. I know who my audience could be, but I have no idea how to reach them.
    If we look at your novel, it fits so comfortably right where you said it would in the “cozy mystery” category. You included the faith element, the supernatural and demonic/witchcraft element, you added the mystery of geneaology, got a great cover and clever title. Anyone who reads Christian cozy mysteries should love the novel.
    I’m personally not a fan of writing with just a “Christian worldview” if it means skimping on the faith elements or not mentioning Jesus in order not to “offend” the militant unbelievers. Besides, morality means nothing when it isn’t cemented with the spiritual element – at least not to me. I’ve read plenty of CBA novels which haphazardly mentioned throwing up a prayer and maybe included one sentence with God in it. Shallow efforts.
    I’ll look forward to anything you write, Karin, and I know you’ll do a good job however you decide to do it. And, yeah, that CBA restrictive reach has tentacles.

    Like

Leave a reply to Nicole Cancel reply