Into the Fire

We've discussed the rules of writing here multiple times and my basic rebellion against them as a statement of what makes a good writer. The rules give a general picture of what constitutes orderly writing, conscientious writing. A writer who is aware of and well-acquainted with these rules will choose which ones are subject to tossing when the particular storyline, voice, and format will be better served by breaking them. For beginner writers, the rules delegate how to create "clean" and functional prose.

However, one thing I think the rules overlook is the savvy reader. Underestimating the flexiblility of readers seems to be a common practice in professional advice. Is the objective to make it easy on the reader? Or is it to make it interesting not only in plot and character but in style and voice?

I have yet to meet a reader who struggled with what the pros call "head-hopping", but I've met lots of writers who are also readers who not only avoid this so-called dastardly deed in their own writing but they complain about it when reading it done by another author. My question to them is did they notice it before it was explained to them as a no-no? (Bren, I know this is one of your pet peeves.) Head-hopping is changing points of view frequently without alerting the reader to, or giving "sufficient notice" for, the different perspective of another character.

Readers of course have their own preferred styles of reading. The Hemingway-types like that clean, functional writing and think a lot of description is tedious and a waste of their time. Readers establish all different kinds of favorites with some of them enjoying just about anything in fiction.

I think by underestimating the versatility of readers, their willingness to engage the story regardless of how it might be written, can produce the sameness we experience so often in certain genres. Without bending the rules, formulaic prose with unimaginative styles and similar sounding voices become the norm and offer little imagination to the adventurous reader. However, benevolent readers will continue to read the same kinds of stories as long as those stories keep them interested.  

Father, help us to write as you direct. To create beauty, humor, truth, and entertainment riddled with your insights, revelation, and wisdom. With your divine touch we will be blessed as we bless others. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

(*Winners Linda and Debi of book giveaway have been sent an email. Please send me an address. Merry Christmas!)