Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

            
Stereotype

 

From my novel reading I've found one of the most difficult tasks to accomplish is to take the stereotype out of the evil character. More than anyone else, the antagonist is portrayed similarly in so many novels. It's understandable. Although evil appears in many forms, sociopaths and psychopaths definitely contain comparable personality traits resulting in some predictable leanings or actions.

Toning it down to the less threatening antagonists such as mean girls or ladder-climbers or those who like to sabotage their acquaintances, it's still a battle to create them with unique characteristics.

Why is this?

Possibly it's because inherent in evil is the ultimate selfishness manifested in dramatic self-serving behaviors. Add perversions or murderous tendencies and mix those with the inability to feel remorse, the author is obligated to demonstrate those common denominators of evil. Originality doesn't come easy other than in the possible surroundings or weaponry used to inflict maximum harm which is where the depravity of the villain can be exploited.

When writers loose their imaginations to explore evil, the possibilities are endless in spite of their being "nothing new under the sun". And perhaps it's that very observation way back in Solomon's time that explains the stereotypical antagonist in stories, be it a man or a spirit. Sin has been prevalent for a long time on earth. All kinds of it have been apparent and flourishing in this fallen world.

Do you notice the evil stereotype in your reading? Have you fought to produce a villain who appeared "different" in his makeup or actions? 

 

Father, help each of us to write with authenticity. Help us to look inside of ourselves and write from the place of honesty. May we always honor you with our stories and be grateful for the opportunity to tell them. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

 

Posted in

3 responses to “Again and again . . .”

  1. BK Jackson Avatar

    The antagonist is hard to write. The antagonist in my first novel is someone who is truly self-centered, without the good intentions toward others. He is capable of love, but a love gone wrong.
    Yet on the other hand, when you try to paint your antagonist as sympathetic in some way, sometimes that kind seem cliche as well.
    Can’t say I’ve mastered the writing of the antagonist yet. But I keep trying.

    Like

  2. Brenda Anderson Avatar

    I think a big problem writers have with creating the antagonist is that they’re two-dimensional at best. A well-written antagonist will be several layers deep. I think that’s one reasons I enjoy Steven James’ books so much. His antagonists are very well-rounded & multi-dimensional.

    Like

  3. Nicole Avatar

    I would agree Steven James puts together some unique, multi-dimensional villains – horrible as they are. And I must say the only Dean Koontz novel I read had a very unique and truly scary villain. We could still point out the similarities in them because let’s face it: evil is a stereotype. We know what it looks like. To a degree. Which is what makes Steven James’ antagonists so amazing: at first, they’re unrecognizable.
    Brenda, I think the awareness of the tendency to create a cliched antagonist is the very thing that helps us try to make one different. Yours sounds interesting because you say he is “capable of love”. The totally selfish factor is in all villains. I don’t see how that can be avoided. Actually, the selfish factor is in all of us, just in varying degrees.

    Like

Leave a reply to BK Jackson Cancel reply