Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

 

  
Number-1-sign

 

How important are those first sentences to you? As a reader? As a writer? Those first paragraphs? Those first chapters?  

For me, the genre has a lot to do with the impact of a first sentence, paragraph, and chapter. I've said before, and I mean it, I'm a patient reader. I'm willing to give an author some elbow room in developing a story. I'm also a realist. If I'm not interested or my curiosity isn't piqued by the end of the first chapter or first three chapters if they're short, it might not look good for the book I'm reading.

If I've been given the opportunity to review the novel, and I selected it, I'm going to trudge through the thing regardless of my lack of interest. If I have no obligation to the book, chances are, at this time in my life, I know by then whether or not it warrants any more of my attention.

"First" sentences don't need to be acutely dynamic for me to continue. I can tell you who writes dynamite first sentences, but they're all in the suspense/thriller categories, so they want to grab the reader and shake them if possible. These authors accomplish their goals: Robert Liparulo, Steven James, James Scott Bell, Athol Dickson, and Sibella Giorello. Certainly not the only ones, but definitely good at opening stories.

How do you rate your first sentences in the novel(s) you've written? And how important is it for you to get it just right?

 

Father, just help me to write the way you want it, to tell the stories you have for me to tell. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.  

Posted in

4 responses to “Those “firsts” . . .”

  1. BK Jackson (@BKJacksonAZ) Avatar

    I want to start my book well but a first sentence doesn’t need to be all glitz and glitter. Really the only useful purpose that serves is for the sentence to earn its way onto someone’s future “Top 10 first Lines” discussion ranked somewhere under “Call me Ishmael.”
    Those lists are nice distractions for writers but not exactly crucial. Sure, we want to convey who’s talking and know a little about them and what’s going on very quickly in the story–it’s definitely a story killer if the author doesn’t bother to introduce you to a nameless/faceless person on page one and inserts no other reason for you to care.
    I prefer a reader grab me within the first chapter. But the truth is, I’ve read books that it took the author SEVERAL chapters to grab me and I’m glad I didn’t put it down.
    And since I view myself as a slower starter than most, I hope when the time comes, they’ll give me more than one paragraph or two to test my story. But that’s for the reader to decide.

    Like

  2. Nicole Avatar

    I agree. I think a good first sentence matters if the story is going to take some time to develop. Doesn’t have to rock me, but I like to be intrigued. Good points, Brenda, and I agree with them all.

    Like

  3. Brenda Anderson Avatar

    My first lines? Let’s just say that most are an unending work-in-progress.
    As far as judging a book from its first line–never understood that, although I know people do. By the end of the first chapter I’ll likely have a solid opinion of the novel, but to judge a 100,000 word novel based on a first sentence or even a first paragraph doesn’t make sense to me.
    One of my favorite novels of all time, A Voice in the Wind by Francine Rivers, took me several chapters before I reached the can’t-put-down stage. Now I’ve read that novel multiple times. So glad I didn’t judge it by its slow beginning.

    Like

  4. Nicole Avatar

    True, I agree, Bren. Look at Peretti’s early two sensational novels (This Present Darkness and Piercing the Darkness) and Prophet. Takes a while to develop but so worth the wait. It depends on the writer and the genre how long I’m willing to hang in there.
    As far as my own go . . . well, I’ve got to like them. Beyond that, I can’t say.

    Like

Leave a reply to Nicole Cancel reply