I don't like to read novellas. They're too short. Even well-written and well done, I will rarely read a novella. I prefer long and involved stories. And I've always hated short stories.
Every once in awhile we make exceptions to our "soft" rules. They're movable. They're not critical. They have no dangerous side effects – at least in the case of long or short novels, they don't.
I don't even like to read short novels that hover between a novella and a medium length novel, but I've read more than a few.
Christian fiction has produced some longer novels, but usually they're written by the blockbuster authors who sell well. Again, exceptions surface but not often.
I don't have an indisputable reason for preferring the longer novels. The very reason I love some of them is because of the minute details concerning locations, characters, and situations. Give me well-developed and defined characters and you've definitely got my attention. I love subtleties in writing them. How they stand, expressions, asides, you name it. If unique or even commonplace characteristics or defining moments come from the author's words, I'm entranced.
However, if I'm supposed to review a novel that happens to be long where none of the above qualities exist, it's a struggle to grind through the pages. If an author chooses to write a long story, they risk losing readers who don't wish to spend much time on a novel. Long intense thrillers are most likely to maintain a reader's attention.
Tuesday musings on reading books and stories . . .
Father, help us to write what you have for each of us to do. You've made us unique. You have specific desires and plans for us. May we fulfill them. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Leave a reply to Nicole Cancel reply