Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

                    BcyLX7McL

I finished a novel I planned to review for this Monday slot, but I couldn't do it. Why? It's simple really. There's not one good thing about the characters in this fairly long story. I'm not going to publicly name the author or title. I will tell you he's successful, secular, and has written many novels. I'm just going to mention things about the characters and ask your opinion on why anyone would desire to write, let alone read, a story about characters who have serious deficiencies such as addiction, psychopathic tendencies, who are convincing liars, perverts, murderers, etc. Using a worldly expression: not one of them had any truly redeeming qualities, albeit the heroine did manage to care about the children who were victims and the two men who were wrongfully incarcerated for their demise, one of whom suspiciously committed suicide after briefly being jailed!

The author knew how to tell a compelling story or I wouldn't have finished the book. It became a matter of determining if he was going to allow one good thing to happen after all the despicable drivel the characters projected and endured. I suspect he thought he engineered sympathy for the heroine, but he only managed to cryptically and effectively describe her gambling addiction and the severe harm it caused adding to the extreme ugliness of all the other characters and their vile behaviors. She managed to persevere through her addiction to solve the two murders separated by a number of years – this after losing her job as a detective while sleeping with her detective partner who was convicted of falsifying evidence and who she later discovered was a partner in the group who committed the crimes against these two female children (and many more) and set up those who took the fall for them. 

So no review today. Why would you want to write or read a novel with not one good thing in the story?  

 

Father, there is so much ugliness in this world. I don't know how you can be so patient with all of us. It breaks my heart daily to see the atrocities and to assess my own failures. Thank you for your unequaled mercy and grace. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

Posted in

3 responses to “Not one good thing?”

  1. BK Jackson Avatar
    BK Jackson

    RE: “Not one good thing” — what defines that is subjective, I suspect. However, as I try to filter back through things I’ve read, unless I can think of one later, all the books I’ve read had at least some redeemable characters.
    I don’t know author’s thought process behind his/her decisions regarding the book, but I’m sure one of the battles might’ve been “I know people like this and they DON’T have redeeming qualities.” or “This is real life.” But ultimately they’ll learn through sales whether it was a good idea or a bad one. Or maybe it was just one they had to get out of their system.

    Like

  2. Brenda S. Anderson Avatar

    Reminds me of the musical “Chicago.” There’s nothing redeeming about any of the characters or the story, yet the musical is wildly popular. As a musical fan, I don’t get it!

    Like

  3. Nicole Petrino-Salter Avatar

    You both make good points. There are few books that I’ve read where no characters had redeeming qualities. This one was an exception. Although the “heroine” had her concern for the victims, in the end she dissolved her positive behavior. It was just a bad book, and if that’s “real life” for this author or his readers, they live in an ugly and sheltered (in a bad place) life.

    Like

Leave a reply to BK Jackson Cancel reply