Into the Fire

Passionate thoughts about the world of writing and the Power of God

  • Another review of The Famous One at Spire Reviews by Brenda Anderson:

     

    http://spirereviews.blogspot.com/2010/09/famous-one.html

     

    It means extra to me when the reader (who is also a novel writer) tells you he/she won’t review a book if he/she doesn’t like it and then chooses to review it. It’s also interesting that some of the take-away from this story is the premise of the scripture verse: Luke 9:25. While this is one of the “results” emerging from the story, this particular point was not the basis or purpose for it. I love to hear how people react to stories. Brenda and I have similar tastes in reading material and share like-minded views of the need for stretching in Christian fiction. Thank you, Brenda.

     

    Immanuel’s Veins is on its way. Hopefully the T-shirt contest will conclude sometime next week. I’ve been assured Thomas Nelson will have one waiting for the winner. The sizes are Medium, Large, and X-Large.

     

    God bless you with His abundance this day, in the Name of Jesus, Amen.

  • The way it came down is not pretty nor is it recommended. There was genuine heartbreak and devastation. There was resistance . . . but it was . . . futile.

     

    There was love, rebellion, and passion.

     

    There was no Jesus.

     

    Thirty-seven years later, there is a thirty-second wedding anniversary with real love, real loss, real gain, but even more important, there is the real Jesus who waited, loved, healed, forgave and forgave, and bathed this couple in His mercy.

     

    We’re flawed and always learning. We’ve traveled down so many roads together. Stumbling. Falling. Getting up to try again. And still we persevere. Love is strong. Jesus is our inspiration. 

     

    Real.

     

    Michael, I love you. Forever. Happy Anniversary. 

  • Post ACFW Conference CAROL AWARDS:

     

    2010 Carol Award Winners

     

    Contemporary Novella


    Susan May
    Warren – The Great Christmas Bowl (Tyndale House, Karen Watson – Editor)

     

    Historical Novella


    Janet Tronstad – Christmas Bells for Dry Creek (Steeple Hill, Tina James – Editor)

     

    Short Contemporary


    Mae Nunn – A Texas Ranger's Family (Steeple Hill, Melissa Endlich – Editor)

     

    Short Contemporary Suspense

     

    Jill Elizabeth Nelson – Evidence of Murder (Steeple Hill, Emily Rodmell – Editor)

     

    Short Historical


    Dan Walsh – The Unfinished Gift (Revell, Andrea Doering)

     

    Young Adult


    Jenny B. Jones – I'm So Sure (Thomas Nelson, Natalie Hanemann/Jamie Chavez – Editors)

     

    Long Contemporary


    Christina Berry – The Familiar Stranger* (Moody Publishers, Paul Santhouse – Editor)

     

    Long Contemporary Romance


    Jenny B. Jones – Just Between You and Me* (Thomas Nelson, Natalie Hanemann/Jamie Chavez – Editors)

     

    Mystery


    A.K. Arenz – The Case of the Mystified M.D. (Sheaf House, Joan M. Shoup – Editor)

     

    Suspense/Thriller


    Terri Blackstock – Intervention* (Zondervan, Sue Brower/Dave Lambert – Editors)

     

    Long Historical


    Allison Pittman – Stealing Home (Multnomah, Alice Crider – Editor)

     

    Long Historical Romance


    Mary Connealy – Cowboy Christmas (Barbour Publishing, Rebecca Germany – Editor)

     

    Speculative (includes Science Fiction, Fantasy, Allegory)


    Kirk Outerbridge –
    Eternity Falls* (Marcher Lord Press, Jeff Gerke – Editor)

     

    Women's Fiction


    Cheryl McKay & Rene Gutteridge – Never the Bride (Waterbrook Press,
    Shannon Marchese – Editor)

     

    Debut Author


    Dan Walsh – The Unfinished Gift (Revell, Andrea Doering – Editor)

     

    *Reviewed on this blog.

     

    Special congratulations to Kirk Outerbridge and Marcher Lord Press for entertaining me with cyborg, sci-fi, fantasy? Very hard to do.

     

    I’m so glad to see Terri Blackstock win with Intervention. Genuine suspense. A very well done novel.

     

    Continue to watch over and lead your writers, Lord. Let us all take to heart that it’s not about us. It’s all about you. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

  • Football mania accelerates after each game. We fly high or sink beneath the radar each week. High fives or down lows. Nothing quite like the fans of football, the devotion to a team. Manic v Depression.

     

    I’ve been a Seahawks fan since their inception. We used to be in the AFC before the restructuring. Our big-time hated opponents were the Denver Broncos. They’ve always man-handled us no matter who was coaching, who was playing, at Mile High or here: we often lost. As we did again on Sunday afternoon. We stunk. They shone.

     

    Nevertheless, what happens when a young Denver teammate at the age of 23 years of age with the remarkable skills to make it to the NFL, even though he’s rehabbing from injury, finds life so bleak and utterly hopeless that he fires a kill-shot into himself? With limited information available this is the first report: a suicide in his master bedroom while his girlfriend and their child were running errands.

     

    Twenty-three year old Kenny McKinley killed himself. A self-inflicted gunshot wound at first examination by the Sheriff. While everyone mourns, the question most asked by those who have no idea is “Why?” Why when the young man seemed to have everything to live for did he consider life too barren to live it?

     

    I remember the intensity of the young twenties. I didn’t know the Lord at that time in my life, and the struggle to find some kind of happiness often made me feel empty. I managed to mess up many things in those early years, but the Lord allowed me to travel the long way home to Him. I harbor many regrets under the Blood.

     

    It grieves me to think this young man couldn’t find a place in his heart to find mercy, to find hope, to survive the dark times of the soul even when others think there’s no reason you should experience them. So sad . . .

     

    God in heaven, only you know where Kenny has gone. Comfort those who mourn, Lord. You’re the only One who can. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.      

  • I know some of you grow weary of TV Talk here, but I’m excited about the new fall lineups. As I’ve said innumerable times, I love the medium of television even though a lot of it isn’t worth viewing. That’s the way it is. I pick and choose what inspires me.

     

    Number one: Chemistry. That doesn’t mean the shows I watch must contain the UST factor (Unresolved Sexual Tension for you amateurs). Admittedly that can get old over the long haul of a series. However, if done well, of course it can be an asset to the series. UST requires superb writers. Without them it’s just another daytime TV soap opera in the evening. The chemistry factor means the actors fit. They either spark or spar well on screen, and they present a believable reality in their drama whether long term or short term. I do not like the choices of “good guys” morphing into “bad guys” over the course of the episodes. They have to represent one side or the other and do it well, or if they’re wavering in their character, possibly have a redemptive moment near the end.

     

    Number Two: Empathy. Somehow the main characters must elicit empathy. The goal must convey a purpose worth serving. If the show encompasses amazing specialization, there has to be a human core that grips the emotion and establishes characters worth rooting for and/or cheering on to some kind of victory. If it’s an ordinary neighborhood facing life in general, the characters and events must compel me to establish a favorite, a cause and reason for getting involved.

     

    Number Three: Casting. If types of characters and actors don’t match, the story is off kilter from the beginning. Some actors grow into their roles and in the process don’t “offend” the viewer, but when an actor is miscast, it sticks out like neon on gold. It doesn’t work.

     

    Of course there are other factors which endear us to our favorites, and if we continue to watch a series, it’s because we’ve made concessions for the weaknesses because the positives keep us tuning in week after week.

     

    I used to love slapstick comedy. John Ritter was a master at it following in the footsteps of some of the greats like Lucille Ball, Carol Burnett, Harvey Gorman, Red Skelton. But nowadays the comedies are filled with filth and gross innuendoes. I can’t think of a single comedy I’ve watched in recent times even though some of the actors involved represent all kinds of solid comic types.

     

    Recognizing the similarities in establishing good character types and purposeful stories in series television can be common to writing good fiction . . .

     

    Let the series begin!

     

    Lord, thank you for the small things. Raise up your people in the entertainment mediums. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

  • I took a rare step back in time to the late 1920s America in order to read a Julie Lessman novel published by Revell. A Hope Undaunted is vaguely reminiscent of the heart of Pride and Prejudice for me in a different culture but with lots of sisters, a couple of brothers, and the defiant and independent youngest girl by the name of Katie O’Connor determined to have her own way in every area of her life. At 18 years of age, she’s got it all figured out until she oversteps her boundaries one too many times and reaps the results of her rebellious behavior.

     

    After one too many curfew violations, her father demands she act as a volunteer for an orphanage organization the entire summer after her high school graduation without seeing her friends or her boyfriend, the wealthy and insolent Jack who intends to be a lawyer just like she does and who indulges her every whim. The spoiled diminutive Katie with a temper and a fiery independent streak whines to her mother for a reprieve, but her dad prevails and off she goes to work.

     

    Little does she know who her coworkers will be, and one of them provides the shock of her young lifetime. In a mishmash of hormonal outbursts and carrying-on, Katie learns the hard way that her life is much more out of order than she ever intended it to get in spite of doing everything she can to make impossibilities happen the way she’s planned.

     

    Her older sisters and brothers face their own crises while Katie watches everything she’d hoped for erupt into chaos. Brought up in a home of faith, Katie never exactly had time for God’s plans since she didn’t technically need Him to help her figure out what she wanted. That is until she discovers her designs leave her wanting and forcing circumstances which don’t truly fit the way they should.

     

    Equaling her on the stubborn-factor meter is the man “Luke” who cannot be resisted, ignored, or toyed with the way she’s used to doing with the other men in her life. Just when we think everything’s going to work out the way it’s supposed to do, there’s a serious roadblock. Or two.

     

    The title A Hope Undaunted speaks for many individuals in this story. The peripheral characters get careful consideration in the scope of the tale, presenting the unique family components and how they mesh into each other’s lives. When their faith is challenged, they look to each other, pray, and allow God to do what He does so well, and several difficult and seemingly impossible situations gradually turn around after crisis hits hard. While God drives the characters of faith, the mention of Jesus appears only once.

     

    I read this novel to see how Julie Lessman handled romance and passion. I’d been told she did it well and with honesty. I agree. I think because of the eras in which she writes, the intensity of attraction and the resulting actions play well. (Her other novels are farther back in historical fiction.) There’s still a certain innocence in the component of the passionate scenes, but there’s plenty of innuendo and wonderful attraction goin’ on between Katie and her nemesis/love of her life as well as with her married sisters and husbands, and between her mom and dad which is extremely refreshing.

     

    From the writing standpoint, the conflict seemed endless. At times Katie seemed all of her 18 years in her conduct and Luke seemed old beyond his years which he would’ve been to a certain extent because of how he was forced to grow up. As my regular visitors here know, I have a serious problem with female characters who whine and play games with themselves and others. So Katie’s little temper tantrums and fickle flings, plus her downright cruel words at times drove me a little nuts. She’s portrayed as such a young feminist that it seemed incongruent for her to slip out of one man’s arms and into another’s. Most feminists tend to be self-absorbed, some even man-haters. Katie definitely fit the self-absorbed portion but seemed to need a man in her life regardless if it was the right one. However, as the story arrived at the three-quarters mark, we could finally see some growth in the young woman without understanding why she favored the martyr tendency concerning her marriage. Luke is the classic hero, stubborn, drop-dead gorgeous with major sex appeal, cockiness with that vulnerability which grabs female hearts easily. His loyalty, sense of duty, and the willingness to make a noble sacrifice rival that of a soldier’s. Again, writing-wise, there were several pet phrases repeated throughout the novel which became tiresome.  

     

    For the lovers of innocent romance stories who enjoy a period piece set in America with plenty of sparks and conflicts before arriving at a satisfactory conclusion, Revell’s A Hope Undaunted by Julie Lessman is the novel for you.

     

     

    734151
     

     

    Available September 2010 at your favorite bookseller from Revell, a division of Baker Publishing Group. 

     

    Father, continue to supply the stories for Julie to tell. Please bless her as she writes to honor you with honesty and passion. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.   

  • Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no longer has mastery over him. The death he died, he died to sin once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to God.

     

    . . .  

     

    For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

     

    Romans 6:8-10 (NIV)

     

    Romans 6:23 (NIV)

  •  

    The T-shirt is dark grey with a black sketched anatomically correct heart in the front and center. The words SPREAD THE LOVE appear on the lower right portion of the sketched heart in red. You can win it by leaving a comment on any post through the day I review Immanuel’s Veins by Ted Dekker.

     

    Just add “T-shirt” at the end of your comment so I can assign you a number. Dayle and WordLily are running head and head. Whoever wins will receive the T-shirt courtesy of Thomas Nelson Publishers.

  • Remember back when the professionals commented on desired changes for Christian fiction? Remember how some peripheral discussions during that rather highly-charged debate time regarding a certain author’s initial post brought comments of weariness on the whole subject? Remember how some author/agent/editor comments were succinct? Some were light-hearted and some were downright ticked off? Remember the similarities in many of them?

     

    This is a blog about writing. Some days I post passionate thoughts about what I think of the overall writing biz from this position of knowing some wonderful and valuable people who happen to be insiders while I remain on the outside as an observer. Usually never without emotion and virtually always with passion, I give the ambiguous “you” my thoughts. Some of you have become lifetime friends although we’ve never met in person. Others of you are generous with your time and pop in once in awhile and ponder my musings. Others join me when I run an interview of a favorite author, agent, or editor. And still others show up for specific book reviews. All are welcome.

     

    This is also a blog about the triune God. I post about my love for Jesus and the voice of the Holy Spirit. I share the magnificence of His power and how I can’t measure His love in my finite mind. I write about people who want God to be something He’s not, and I write about the enemy of our souls who seeks to devour us like a raptor on a rabbit.

     

    If you’re just getting here, you don’t know me. If something written here interests you, you might read my profile or scan certain previous posts to get a feel for who this woman is, but who I am at this blog might not mesh with who I am in person. That is not intentional. At all. The last thing I want to be is two-faced. One way with some and another way with others. I want you to visit here often enough to “know” me should we ever meet in person.

     

    Like Chip MacGregor commented in his interview when he said he’s “bigger in print”, I probably am also. More bold. More inclined to state my opinion since isn’t that what blogs are all about stripped down? Our opinions, others’ opinions? Of course that doesn’t mean the absence of facts, but it can mean that facts don’t always enter into the fray. It can mean facts can’t be determined in subjective matter.

     

    Being a passionate person, I either feel strongly about something or not at all. It has to matter to me. I want to tell you the truth about books I read, how I feel about the biz, the devotion with which I desire to serve the Lord. I don’t want to hurt or disrespect anyone. Doesn’t mean I won’t. It means I don’t aim for that. Most likely if it happens, it’ll happen in a rant. And why? Because I’m offended. And I get to voice my opinion. Sometimes I should, and sometimes I shouldn’t. No doubt I’ll figure it out the hard way.

     

    What I don’t want you to get when you visit here is a two-faced person who criticizes for the sake of having a venue to do it. If I criticize something, I hope there is value in it.  

     

    Some days, there is a weariness to it all. I love writing and I love discussing it, but sometimes it really seems so small and insignificant. All the hoopla, marketing, fanfare. New authors! New books! New promotions! New/Old. All the same. I’m not knocking it. At all. This usually happens when I view the enemy in action. When I see people succumbing to his wiles, his schemes. When I feel it. Personally. The shiny new books lose their glimmer. My stories feel small. I lose intensity. But, I go to the Lord, my reservoir. And the waters for my soul pour into me and give me renewal. I take my place in the kingdom and willingly bow to the Lord Almighty.

     

    Whatever it is you have for me to do, let me give my best. I don’t care how it measures up on anyone else’s scales. Only you matter, only your value placement is vital to my heart. And you, above all others, are the most generous and kind and just. Thank you, Father.

     

    Forgive me when I plunge ahead of you, Lord. Subdue me. Lead me. In the Name of Jesus, Amen.

  • Yes, I think I’ve figured it out. The more I read, the more it takes to impress me. And I think I know why, too. Which is important, don’t you think?

     

    Go to any writers’ sites. Any of them. Except for this one of course where I only occasionally refer to “the rules” with a sarcastic bite to the words and a definite rebellious tone. Posted on those sites by nearly every author, published and not yet so, you will at some point get the list of “Rules of Writing”. The more generous (and wise) of the bunch will add as an afterthought that these “rules” should be used as guidelines. (Again, thank you Captain Barbossa.) The list screeches about using adverbs and adjectives and ing words, compelling you to eliminate as many as possible. Add to that dialogue tags, a no-no unless the minimal “said” is used and as infrequently as possible. And so on and so forth. They've just been posted yet again at a frequented women’s authors’ blog in case you’ve somehow managed to miss having them pounded and sculpted into engravings on your grey matter.

     

    What do these rules have to do with reading a lot and impressing me? When it’s so easy to spot the diligent usage of the rules to write a story, I’m not impressed. Okay? I’m just not. If all of us writers complied with the rules, we would have more and more of what we have now: a copious amount of forgettable fiction.

     

    Do you have any idea how difficult it is to make characters unique? Stories which seem different? It’s almost impossible. There’s nothing new under the sun, folks. Nothing. So when a person like me tackles another story, and it’s so much like an episode of a series I’ve just watched on television or a novel I read last month, can I say I’m not impressed? So if the plot is cliché only because I’ve read or watched so many similar stories, how can the book “impress” me? With the writing. That’s all that’s left.

     

    Do any of you remember the series Shark starring James Woods that only ran for a short time as far as series-television goes? It had a unique plot with a famous defense lawyer switching sides to become a prosecuting attorney due to the domestic murder committed by one of his clients after “Shark” got him acquitted of a domestic violence charge. Besides being perfectly cast, the writing was superb. The dialogue was over-the-top exceptional, the stories complex and interesting. I don’t know why it didn’t last longer, although I must admit to sustain that level of truly good episodes week after week, year after year, would’ve been tough. Very tough.

     

    Many of you don’t care about TV. Fine. I do. I love it. I look forward to several shows each year. I hope they sustain their level of past expertise knowing full well how difficult it will be to do exactly that. Dialogue has to sync with character growth. Plots have to create new tensions, feature different players, seek out new approaches to the same old processes. Not easy to do and sustain yet another three to nine months of audience interest.

     

    The point? If the writing remains the same old, same old, then the outcome is formulaic, boring, and/or unimpressive. Now. If you’re a new reader to an author or a new viewer to a series, you might not feel the same about the book or show. It’s your first trip in this venue and you’ve yet to be impressed or unimpressed. At first view, you might be intrigued. Eager to follow-up with the next novel or the next segment of the series. You might even think this author or this series on TV is the best ever in your world. And that’s terrific! I think everyone should have an opportunity to enjoy the novels and television shows of their choices.

     

    For me, I’ve figured out it takes some interesting writing to impress me. Unfortunately that’s vague. On purpose. I love many different kinds of authors. Their voices, their styles, and their abilities to ignore the “guidelines” to create fascinating fiction impress me. Big time.  

     

    Lord, help me to write the way you want me to write. Help me to be true to you above all others. Jesus, you’re all I’m livin’ for . . .